Protection order enforced after threats to woman and child 

Transcript:
Bring off that PPO. Just one quick second here to summarize quickly. Continuing protective party is an Emily Bruner. He is prohibited from entering onto the premise. posed a credible threat to the physical safety of the petitioner and or of the child of the petitioner. He is prohibited from entering onto property where a petitioner lives, which is 543, Emily Boulevard, and Mayo. He is prohibited from assault, attacking, beating, molesting, wounding, he's prohibited from removing minor children. He's prohibited from stalking. He's prohibited from appearing within sight. It's prohibited from sending mail, communications, contacting her by telephone, confronting her in a public or a private property, entering onto any property where she may be placing an object or delivering an object to personal property or property owned or leased or occupied, interfering with petitioner's efforts to remove his or her child personal property from premises. Stand by. Prohibited from killing or physically injuring her. Prohibited from entering her place of employment. Prohibited from having access to personal records. Prohibited from purchasing or possessing a firearm. Prohibited from entering workplace or school. Prohibited of removing any animals from his or her possession. Any violation of this order, subjects responded to immediate rest to the civil and criminal contempt powers of the court. They're on it. You've got it? I'll send him a message and advise.

Disclaimer:
This was transcribed by AI and may contain errors. Please verify the information independently.