Male takes female's phone during vehicle theft dispute, Pittsburgh PA


A male took a female's phone and is calling 911 from it. He claims his vehicle was stolen. The female cannot respond because the male has her phone. There is concern about the dispute and possible theft.
Audio|Source: Pittsburgh Police Channel 2 - Zone 3/6
02:20
Transcript:
00:00
Yeah,
00:01
you can show us headed to near Brookline Boulevard, Department No.
00:05
7 and Check on.
00:15
643. We're out at Pobler.
00:26
16 is the advised that rapid is now shown that they are on popular but headed back towards Noble Sound Road.
00:38
643.
00:41
643?
00:44
Is a call taker phone line without a vehicle?
00:49
Carmen, if they're on with a Spanish interpreter.
00:53
Is there any way they can have a pull-the-view pull over? As right now, there's no cars on control.
01:02
624A, where you can put me on public.
01:18
624A, well you can put me on Poplar.
01:27
633.3.
01:30
Good.
01:32
I was just informed that this is just want to be an open line[1]. The male actor took the female's phone and we apparently have another person calling into 911. Um,
01:47
stated that his vehicle was stolen but we're unable to get her to answer any questions because he doesn't have the cheat. He has the phone.
01:57
Copy that. Is there an update on the phase 2?
02:04
The last rapid that I has a show near Prima water refill on the popular side, it looks like the male is calling from the same cell phone number that the females unit trying to report his vehicle to fill on with its overline.
02:18
Copy that, we'll trip the area for him.
Police codes explained
The following codes appeared in the transcript and are explained below:
[1]
open line: 911 call connected but the caller is not speaking
Disclaimer:
This transcript was automatically generated and may contain inaccuracies. Please verify the information independently.
Location mentioned:
Brookline Blvd, Pittsburgh, PA 15226
This shows a Google Street View of the area near the location, which might not be the exact address.
Correct
Incorrect