Suspects rob victim at gunpoint, flee in black Nissan


Audio|Source: Oakland Police Department
03:15
Transcript:
1425 Harrison. The open line coming in at 19 meters, received numerous calls with heavy breathing on the other line, and disconnecting. Into 895, call came in at 2117 hours. Really important copy. Chronic caller, so forth. 9.4. Go for. Do a crime broadcast? No one. An arm that occurred 25 ago, at 143.4 1st Avenue. 22 is going to be California's paper plate Edward Edward, Edward 7, 8, William, 2,1. Should we come back, Nesla, Altima, 4th or white? For Sussex, Sussex 1-2-4-1-0-0-0-0-20, 150, 150 pounds, wearing black ski masks, all black clothing. 994. The suspect vehicle was 9 Charles Henry David 298, 9 Charles Henry David 298, coming back to a Nissan, 4-door black and color, which was last seen going north down on 4th Avenue. The loss was a diamond chain, black Chanel back, which contains the victim's ID, bank cards, and cash. This is incident 935. Channel Square. 20, so the second place is going to have a color front plate, 9-Zibra, yellow. 9-1-3. Should be come back. Lexus I.S. 250, Port-door Black. Copy. Just a rate for a property. 415 shots fighter on B-10 at 1-0-80-Stanford Avenue. Five rounds. I'm trying to do both of those plates from back, Charlie. Zero-5. Do you think of 5? Can you clarify what they were armed with? On with a firearm, handgun black and color. Copy all such a sex, that's one. Just that's one. Not a four. Second four? Three and four. Three Lincoln four. to this property 14 shots barter on B10 at 1080 Stanford Avenue 1.0-80 Stanford Avenue came in an until you has two route and three additional rounds came in five in total incident nine five five five four cab thank you I'm watching nice here copy so before your work like we covered the cover for three oh four on the shots was really good Do you have 14, I copy.
Disclaimer:
This was transcribed by AI and may contain errors. Please verify the information independently.
Location mentioned:
Near Stanford Ave, Oakland, CA 94608
Correct
Incorrect