Fight involving females and security guard at Jewel-Osco, Chicago IL


Multiple calls report a fight between three females and a security guard at the Jewel-Osco near West Division. One male claimed to have a firearm but none was seen. Police detained two individuals at the scene.
Audio|Source: Chicago Police Department Zone 04
02:3
Transcript:
00:00
Did you get a call at Juul for 424 West Division?
00:03
Yeah, I did, actually.
00:05
It's just coming through and multiple of them.
00:07
Looks like it's for a fight, three females and one, Mesa security guard.
00:13
So it's four people total.
00:14
Can I get someone else, anybody else nearby that, Juul, 424 West Division? I'm getting multiple calls about a fight.
00:19
Male of Black had Mesa security guard, and it looks like three females are with them.
00:24
They're all still insane. 22 roll right back.
00:26
It might be teens that did it, I've said it's about four to five of them.
00:31
Paying one pretty well, and all the other got with 21.
00:34
10.4. Units going over that the Jewel will just be advised.
00:36
One of the offenders, he's a male black shorts, which read he has a book bag and claiming to have a firearm, but they didn't see one display, just to use caution.
00:44
180 Eddie. 180, Eddie, sorry.
00:45
You guys check, I have an assault that's a 224 South Michigan, looks like a female black, she's gone kind of northbound on the foot, she had a pink long-sleeved shirt.
00:54
She was yelling out loudly.
00:55
We got through the fan.
00:57
I'll give you further on that in a second.
00:58
A21's got two detained.
00:59
It's 1845 on the clock.
01:01
When did you say, I'm here.
01:02
No, that was for somebody else.
01:03
You guys have two detained as well now?
01:06
All right, ten four.
01:07
Again, A21 has two detained over from the jewel.
Disclaimer:
This was transcribed by AI and may contain errors. Please verify the information independently.
Location mentioned:
Near W Division St, Chicago, IL 60610
This shows a Google Street View of the area near the location, which might not be the exact address.
Correct
Incorrect